Rightmortgageadvice.co.uk - The Mortgage Brokers Blog

Call: 0845 4594490
Email: mail@rightmortgageadvice.co.uk

Archive for the ‘The Mortgage Market’ Category

« Older Entries

85% loan to value Buy to Let mortgage products released by Kensington

Thursday, February 10th, 2011

It’s been a long time since I have had anything significant to write about in terms of new products, but this morning Kensington Mortgages have announced what must be one of the most significant signs to date that mortgage lending is returning to some sense of normality.

Their new buy to let product range is available up to 85% loan to value even for first time landlords, and although arrangement fee’s on the 85% product are 2.5% it is still a major step forward for buy to let landlords particularly as it is available on up to 3 properties with an interest rate of 5.99% fixed for two years and with a portfolio maximum of £1 Million or 3 properties on the product.

Rental coverage requirements are also lower than the competition with a rental yield requirement of 120% coverage at the pay rate required and this should help to ensure that the products are viable . The range also now allows first time landlords into the market at 80% and at this loan to value there is a flat fee product option as well as a 2.5% fee which will work well for those borrowers with higher property values.

The products are also available for both purchase and remortgage however they are only available for properties in England and Wales, have a minimum income requirement of £25,000 or £30,000 above 75% loan to value.

For more information on any of these products please call one of our mortgage advisors on 0845 4594490.

Does a fixed rate mortgage make sense in the current market?

Thursday, February 3rd, 2011

This is probably the biggest mortgage related question on everyone’s lips at the moment and it is certainly very difficult to tell what is going to happen with interest rates. I can remember a conversation with a client almost 18 months ago where media coverage suggested interest rates were going to shoot up and they were worried the tracker product I had recommended might end up being very expensive.

In my opinion the question of whether to fix your interest rate comes in two parts. Firstly your attitude to risk should be taken into account and the severity of the risk assessed too. If you have ample income to afford higher interest rates then it comes down to your preference as to whether to gamble on variable type products, but if you simply couldn’t afford for your mortgage payments to go above current figures then not only should you be considering a fixed rate but also trying to reduce your borrowing levels asap.

The second part of the answer comes down to the difference between fixed rates and variable products, if the difference between a suitable variable product and a fixed is relatively low then even if you are a little risk averse it may be worth opting for a fixed rate. However when the difference is greater it becomes harder to say.

Let’s compare for example a 5 year deal currently on offer with one lender of 6.49% with a 25% deposit, compared to their 2 year fixed and 18month tracker product this is 3-4% higher and this means the chances of it being good value for money long term are much lower as it would require average interest rates over the next five years to be over 5% or so which is a big increase from current rates, hence I would only really recommend this scenario to someone who was really on the borderline of what they can afford and needed absolute long term security.

Many lenders are touting products with an option to switch to a fixed deal at a later date without early repayment charges, but for those who would be at serious risk of being unable to afford their mortgage if rates went up this is probably a poor option, as the reality is that fixed deals available at the time are likely to be higher than now as well.

It remains quite likely that while interest rates must increase at some point, that overall market competition will do too and to some extent increases in bank base rate are likely to be met with at least some reduction in lenders margins. Current two year fixed deals come with an average margin of about 3% over the bank base rate which would have been unthinkable three years ago, so at some point slowly but surely these differences must be eroded by competition as the market improves too.

Mortgages and concrete constructions properties

Monday, January 24th, 2011

There are literally thousands of different concrete construction types which have been used in the UK and some of these are very difficult if not impossible to arrange a mortgage on.

In general it is properties from the post war era of a pre-fabricated construction type which can be difficult however even establishing which type of construction has been used can be a challenge. Most properties built after 1984 are likely to be ok as the introduction of Building Regulations established a suitable guideline for ensuring properties were not defective.

Some concrete construction types particularly those which contain structural iron or steel elements built between the early 1900’s and 1970’s have been found to suffer from concrete corrosion and either require significant work to prevent failure of the concrete or are indeed not suitable to mortgage at all, these are classed as defective types. In these construction types contaminants in the concrete react with the Iron in the steel rotting the concrete and steel beams from the inside out.

There are some very common concrete construction types such as Taylor Wimpey No Fines which should not be a problem though too so if you are looking at buying a property which is a concrete construction type you should inform your mortgage advisor at the outset and they should be able to check with local surveyors to see what construction method has been used and who if anyone might be able to lend on them.

Traditional Buy to Let mortgages not the only option for larger landlords

Friday, April 23rd, 2010

A recurring theme when speaking with buy to let investors across the country at the moment is the difficulty being caused by the dire lack of realistic products for remortgaging or making new purchases.

With current requirements for a minimum deposit of at least 25% and interest rates beginning around the 4% mark for variable rates with deposits of 40% and over its easy to see how many think the current markets offerings are nothing more than a cynical attempt to recoup wider losses by the big banks. And with arrangements fee’s going at anything up to 3.5% I have to agree with them.

There is however another option for Landlords who hold several properties or who have a sizeable income aside from their rental. The private banking sector is increasingly taking up a larger share of this market and with potential interest rates starting from 2.5% or so above base rate and fees typically between 1-2% of the loan balance they make a very attractive proposition to the right clientele.

These lenders not only have the experience in dealing with larger loan sizes and non standard properties, but the human underwriting to look at individual cases which would not meet the standard criteria of high street buy to let mortgage lenders.

The downside is that they typically require assets of around £250,000+ without taking your main residential property into account and or an income of over £100,000 per annum. So while they could prove invaluable for those landlords with a decent portfolio gearing with 25% or more in equity or for the first time investor with a good main income they won’t provide any refuge for the many landlords who worked at maximum leverage and left themselves with less than 25% equity in the their overall portfolio.

If you have several buy to let properties on or about to come onto their standard variable or indeed of you have a significant income instead and would like to find out whether a private banking arrangement could be suitable contact speak to one of our mortgage advisors on 0845 4594490 for independent mortgage advice.

High time APR or Annual Percentage Rate interest calculations were removed from mortgage products

Thursday, November 19th, 2009

One of the most bewildering and confusing items on any mortgage illustration from my point of view must be the Annual Percentage Rate or APR listed on a product. APR was developed to give a comparative measure between various loans to show the overall cost of the borrowing on an annual basis taking into account a much broader range of fees and charges than the loan interest on its own.

Now that’s a good thing where the calculation makes sense, but on mortgage products in its current guise it makes no sense at all.

A simple look at the best buy tables on our website will show you that a product far cheaper during its initial interest rate term may have a much higher APR than a product with a considerably higher rate of interest. The issue is that APR is calculated over the lifetime of the loan and so will also consider the reversion rate of the product after its initial term.

There are several reasons why this is misleading;

  1. 1. Reversion rates are generally variable and not linked directly to bank base rate. In two years time a lender with a previously un-competitive reversion rate may well be leading the market and vice versa – hence it is not a factor that should play a major part in the decision making process.
  2. 2. You would generally regularly remortgage during the early years of your mortgage repayment to ensure a competitive rate of interest so including the reversion rate after the initial mortgage term distorts the picture.
  3. 3. Clever design can skew the figure. Lifetime trackers appear very competitive because they have no reversion rate, and refunding upfront fee’s affects the calculation but could cost a pretty penny if the loan never goes ahead.

APR is a system that was never really designed for mortgage contracts but has become a legal obligation when advertising them due to the confused dual regulatory system between the FSA and the Office of Fair Trading, it makes some sense on unsecured loans and very little in the mortgage market.

It is high time this dual regulation was removed and APR calculations either scrapped on mortgage contracts or replaced with something far more specific to the complex nature a mortgage product.

Why the rate loading Mr Lender?

Monday, October 26th, 2009

When a mortgage broker arranges a mortgage for a borrower the commission they receive (if they take the commission as opposed to a fee) is not standardised but there is however only a limited difference from lender to lender. Typically the percentage is about 0.3 to 0.35% for a residential mortgage with good credit, 0.40 to 0.45% for buy to let mortgages, and slightly higher for adverse credit applications.

Why then are several banks, one of which I won’t name but is almost entirely government owned (guess who?) is loading rates available via intermediaries by anything up to 1% against an equivalent product available through them direct? If these lenders are proposing that it costs them more to accept intermediary applications this is farcical.

They may argue that the intermediary market would simply direct too much business to them which they don’t have funds to supply. This is plausible but I think it is actually pricing intermediary products out of the market to attract business from consumers direct who can then be goat herded into higher rate products with down valuations and clandestine credit scoring, or even lower rate products with ridiculous fee’s which are more expensive in reality. Without a broker to argue the case and guide on fee’s most people will simply accept being cascaded to a higher rate without asking difficult questions, or being declined an application having paid for valuations and the like.

I want someone to actually put the question to these banks, how is this rate loading fair practice and why is it in place? Because to the educated it seems to be the intention to get mortgage advisors out of the market so that dodgy products can once again be sold in bulk. Just look at the return of long early repayment charges on market leading rates as a sign that lenders are looking for ways to lock customers into potentially crippling mortgage rates.

House Price rises driven by larger properties

Tuesday, September 29th, 2009

Findaproperty.com’s new house price index suggests that house prices have remained stagnant at the bottom end of the market while strong rises in higher value properties are propping up the major indices.

Their figures collated from average asking prices on the website over the past month show high value properties climbing at 6.6% annually against a monthly rise of o.3% for first time buyer properties leaving them still down -4.6% year on year. This would appear to suggest that the difficult lending conditions for first time buyers are continuing to drag down property prices as second times buyers struggle to find a purchaser who can afford their property in the current market.

However there is good news in the bag too with average first time buyer affordability improving dramatically fuelled by the price reduction. Their figures for affordability gap or the average deposit required show a drop to £55,700 or 1.74 times gross household income against £71,000 or 2.8 times gross household income in January 2008.

Overall the indices showed a 0.2% rise on August figures leaving the average national asking price at £218,134.

You can see their results and the rest of the overview here Find a property.com’s September House Price Indices

More on buying without deposit

Tuesday, July 21st, 2009

I wrote a couple of weeks ago about the amount of enquiries mortgage brokers are facing around buying without deposit and I forgot to mention a couple of other important ways to buy without deposit in my previous post.

Firstly it is possible to arrange a gifted deposit from relatives or even possibly another interested party using a form of contract which entitles them to ownership of the relevant share of the property. This contract would allow you to buy the interested party out at your choice or entitle them to the share on sale.

This device gives the potential giftor a legal right to some of the proceeds of sale even if values continue to fall and much more certainty of receiving their gift back in the future.

Also those who are lucky enough to have the right to buy a council property may be able to buy without deposit as well because many lenders will accept the discounted value of the property as the deposit as long as their valuation reflects the councils figures.

However if you are  eligible for a Right to Buy but live in a council flat don’t get too excited straight away as many lenders are restricting their exposure on flats due to the flood of 1 bed properties during the boom so if your property isn’t a house its a good idea to speak to a mortgage advisor and see whether a deposit will or will not be required.

Who needs Self Certification?

Thursday, July 2nd, 2009

There have been muted announcement’s from the FSA recently that indicate they may be moving to stop fast track lending and self certification mortgages for people in full time employment but there still seems to be a lack of understanding in what self cert is for.

Self Certification is designed for those who cannot prove their income and for whom normal lending practice of considering income that is not guaranteed at a rate of 50% would cause unfair difficulty in borrowing.
There are many types of employment that are paid largely in commission income ranging from recruitment consultants, estate agents, business development managers to stock brokers, (even mortgage advisors my friend!). These are all forms of employment that may produce a need for self certification.

Other people that are owners of a business that may produce very irregular income streams such as businesses in tourism sectors or a firm that was paid on completion of large irregular contracts may also have a need to self certify particularly when self employed.

What it is not is a means to inflate income. Lenders will withhold the right to contact employers, ask for bank statements and other supporting information so if the figures are out of the ordinary they should be asking questions and hopefully if the FSA keep this mind it won’t be banned. There is a home for Self Certification that shouldn’t be ignored.

Can I Buy without a deposit?

Monday, June 29th, 2009

A big question for many first time buyers at the moment is how can I purchase a house without a deposit in the absence of 100% mortgage products.

One way that is possible is the governments Home Buy Direct shared equity scheme which allows customers to buy a house for 70% or more of its value, the developer or makes a loan for the remainder on an interest free basis which later reverts to a very low rate such as 1.75% after several years. Some of the property developers involved in the scheme are offering purchase without deposit.

The scheme operator is repaid either by staircasing (buying a larger stake in the property towards 100% ownership) or on sale of the property in which case they will take their percentage of the sale value.

Housing associations may also run similar schemes known as shared ownership where you purchase between 25-75% of a property typically and pay a nominal rent on the remainder however these may require a deposit. Broadly both schemes are quite similar.

To find out more search for Home buy Direct on Google etc or for housing associations in your area.

However one way that usually wouldn’t work is if the vendor simply strikes the deposit value off the sale price. Known as a vendors deposit this is now very unlikely to be accepted and pretty much all lenders will take the lesser figure for the valuation leaving you back at square one.

Think carefully before securing other debts against your home. Your home may be repossessed if you do not keep up repayments on your mortgage or any other debt secured on it. We do not usually charge a fee for mortgage advice although you do have the option to pay up to 1.5% of the loan amount. Some buy to let and commercial loans are not regulated by the Financial Services Authority.

© Rightmortgageadvice.co.uk 2008-2010
Fee Free Independent Mortgage Broker & Mortgage Advisor in the UK

Rightmortgageadvice.co.uk is an Appointed Representative of Julian Harris Mortgages Ltd, authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. FSA No 304155