Skip to content

  1. Home

Time to end black-boxing

While everyone is up in arms about bankers bonuses and the lending practices that led to the credit crunch the bigger picture of fair and open practices within the financial services industry seems to have fallen by the wayside to a culture of pandering to politically driven objectives.

One thing that most definitely flies in the face of the FSA’s treating customers fairly objective is the practice of credit scoring and what is referred to as black boxing. Black boxing is one of the terms used to describe the elements of a lenders credit scoring criteria that are kept secret and undisclosed.

While I don’t think that using a system of credit scoring is unfair or bad practice I do believe that it is unfair to keep any part of the methodology behind a scoring system secret. Firstly there have been a lot of issues with lenders accepting a decision in principle from an applicant which obviously incurs no cost, and then declining a mortgage application based on the secondary scoring of the application.

There is an obvious issue with this practice particularly where funds are limited in supply in that it leaves the lender open to accept many more applications than they can possibly fund while accepting application fees and booking fees (many of which are now charged up front) and declining an application post valuation. Interestingly many lenders also now include administration fees within their basic valuation fee, or have moved free valuation incentives to the back end of the deal asking you to pay for a valuation then refunding the costs upon completion. Several newspapers have also reported that many lenders are now removing the right for mortgage brokers and consumers to contest valuation figures on deals with free valuation incentives as a way of forcing borrowers into a higher loan to value product.

It’s also well known that while the idea of a credit blacklisting is a bit of a myth it is true that lenders may apply a weighting to their credit scoring systems that is based on geographic location for example. Some streets or postcodes may be dragged down on score based on the lenders experience in the area which may make it more difficult for people residing there to get credit. Now take this concept and how do we know that ethnic groups for example are not being penalised, which would naturally be illegal under racial discrimination laws? The simple answer is we don’t because we can’t see how these decisions are being made. Which means it’s bad for public faith in the industry and consequently the industry as a whole.

THINK CAREFULLY BEFORE SECURING OTHER DEBTS AGAINST YOUR HOME. YOUR HOME MAY BE REPOSSESSED IF YOU DO NOT KEEP UP REPAYMENTS ON YOUR MORTGAGE OR ANY OTHER DEBT SECURED ON IT. YOU DO NOT HAVE TO PAY A FEE FOR OUR SERVICES AS WE RECEIVE COMMISSION FROM LENDERS. IF YOU PREFER YOU CAN PAY 1% FEE ON COMPLETION AND WE WILL PAY ANY COMMISSION WE RECEIVE TO YOU. SOME BUY TO LET AND COMMERCIAL LOANS ARE NOT REGULATED BY THE FINANCIAL CONDUCT AUTHORITY
© RIGHTMORTGAGEADVICE.CO.UK 2009-2016
RIGHTMORTGAGEADVICE.CO.UK IS AN APPOINTED REPRESENTATIVE OF JULIAN HARRIS MORTGAGES LTD, AUTHORISED AND REGULATED BY THE FINANCIAL CONDUCT AUTHORITY. FSA NO 304155
THE FINANCIAL OMBUDSMAN SERVICE (FOS) IS AN AGENCY FOR ARBITRATING ON UNRESOLVED COMPLAINTS BETWEEN REGULATED FIRMS AND THEIR CLIENTS. FULL DETAILS OF THE FOS CAN BE FOUND ON ITS WEBSITE AT WWW.FINANCIAL-OMBUDSMAN.ORG.UK

Get advice
Request mortgage advice
close the form
Your details
Contact details
Enquiry details

Request impartial advice from one of our qualified mortgage brokers. By pressing submit you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.